In my humble Biggest Loser watching opinion Cameron should have given the nothing bracelet to Sammy NOT Sharif. Sure he "fell on his sword" (and I quote directly) by "taking his foot off the pedal" (again quoting directly) by falling BELOW THE YELLOW LINE so his daughter could make it to the final And then Sharif PLAYED THE GAME WITH INTEGRITY (yet another direct quote) during the fat cutting elimination with Ajay by voting Cameron out as was his wish. So if Cameron was ALSO PLAYING THE GAME WITH INTEGRITY he would have rewarded Sharif for doing his bidding by keeping the bracelet IN THE FAMILY and giving Sharif the opportunity to be THIS YEAR'S BIGGEST LOSER.
I'm just saying.....if you understand none of the paragraph above you've probably come a little late to TBL given that it finishes TONIGHT. I for one will be racing HOME FROM CHOIR in time to SEE WHO WINS. It's going to be a VERY EXCITING MOMENT IN BIGGEST LOSER HISTORY. (Still yet to find that book. Wait...perhaps I have been writing aforementioned history here in my endless pernicky BL posts).
Then I watched the last hour of the dancin' program. I'm not into dancing particularly. Still it looked like the finalists could dance. I could have done with more from the excerpt from Chicago. That was fun. Can anyone tell me what the function of these judges was on this program? Did they ever actually judge anything or did they just sit there to comment? Can they dance? Why did the 12 year old boy on the right always wear a hat? So many questions.
And then I mistakenly began watching Rove, quickly realised the error of my ways and went to bed.
-
No comments:
Post a Comment